[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57503859.6090605@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 15:44:57 +0200
From: Jérôme Forissier <jerome.forissier@...aro.org>
To: "Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Vinayak Holikatti <vinholikatti@...il.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Michael Ryleev <gmar@...gle.com>,
Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Yaniv Gardi <ygardi@...eaurora.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v4,4/8] char: rpmb: provide user space interface
Hi Tomas,
On 06/01/2016 11:41 PM, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> The user space API is achieved via single synchronous IOCTL.
> The request is submitted in in_frames_ptr pointer and received
> in out_frames_ptr.
I like this, because it's exactly what I wish existed when I wrote the
eMMC RPMB back-end for OP-TEE secure storage [1] ;-)
Same goes for patch 5/8 "char: rpmb: add RPMB simulation device": with
this I could just drop my custom simulation layer.
So, this goes in the right direction IMHO.
[1]
https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_client/blob/master/tee-supplicant/src/rpmb.c
--
Jerome
Powered by blists - more mailing lists