[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1464875891-5443-8-git-send-email-konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 22:58:10 +0900
From: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@....ntt.co.jp>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-nilfs <linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@....ntt.co.jp>
Subject: [PATCH 7/8] nilfs2: do not use yield()
Use cond_resched() instead of yield() in the loop of
nilfs_transaction_lock() since the usage corresponds to the "be nice
for others" case that the comment of yield() says.
This removes the following checkpatch.pl warning:
"WARNING: Using yield() is generally wrong. See yield() kernel-doc
(sched/core.c)"
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@....ntt.co.jp>
---
fs/nilfs2/segment.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c b/fs/nilfs2/segment.c
index 7e1864c..5a97282 100644
--- a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c
+++ b/fs/nilfs2/segment.c
@@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ static void nilfs_transaction_lock(struct super_block *sb,
nilfs_segctor_do_immediate_flush(sci);
up_write(&nilfs->ns_segctor_sem);
- yield();
+ cond_resched();
}
if (gcflag)
ti->ti_flags |= NILFS_TI_GC;
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists