linux-kernel - [PATCH 08/11] cpufreq: imx: Use 'index' only to index into policy->freq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <cbdf2d4b7dc59280f53191d892163a629fe8dba8.1464876460.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date:	Thu,  2 Jun 2016 19:49:08 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>,
	Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>, Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>,
	Steven Miao <realmz6@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 08/11] cpufreq: imx: Use 'index' only to index into policy->freq_table

Later patches would make changes in cpufreq core, after which
policy->freq_table may be reordered by cpufreq core and it wouldn't be
safe anymore to use 'index' for any other local arrays.

To prepare for that, use policy->freq_table[index].driver_data for other
driver specific usage of 'index'. The 'driver_data' fields are already
set properly by the driver.

Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c | 13 ++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
index 3858dc7e617b..e7da85890e8c 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c
@@ -42,14 +42,21 @@ static unsigned int transition_latency;
 static u32 *imx6_soc_volt;
 static u32 soc_opp_count;
 
-static int imx6q_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
+static int imx6q_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int pindex)
 {
 	struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
 	unsigned long freq_hz, volt, volt_old;
-	unsigned int old_freq, new_freq;
+	unsigned int old_freq, new_freq, index;
 	int ret;
 
-	new_freq = policy->freq_table[index].frequency;
+	new_freq = policy->freq_table[pindex].frequency;
+
+	/*
+	 * policy->freq_table may be sorted differently, get the index value we
+	 * are concerned about.
+	 */
+	index = policy->freq_table[pindex].driver_data;
+
 	freq_hz = new_freq * 1000;
 	old_freq = clk_get_rate(arm_clk) / 1000;
 
-- 
2.7.1.410.g6faf27b