linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v1 3/3] regulator: qcom_smd: add linear range to pm8941 lnldo

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160602155032.GL2282@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 2 Jun 2016 16:50:32 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Cc:	bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 3/3] regulator: qcom_smd: add linear range to
 pm8941 lnldo

On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 03:57:42PM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> On 02/06/16 15:49, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Why is this better than using a separate set of ops for the driver?

> Am ok either way, it would be just few more lines for separate set of ops.

It's more natural to use a separate set of ops, and we can optimise a
few things if we know the regulator is a fixed voltage one.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)