linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 06/10] fs/namei.c: Improve dcache hash function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFwGXb4QfbNBkgET7Ouwk3v5t7rVGanbdO-Mju6r4C6f7A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 2 Jun 2016 09:35:37 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	George Spelvin <linux@...encehorizons.net>
Cc:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/10] fs/namei.c: Improve dcache hash function

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 7:31 PM, George Spelvin
<linux@...encehorizons.net> wrote:
>
> I could use two more iterations of HASH_MIX() or something similar,
> then just take the x value, but that's 6 cycles.  If a multiply is
> 4 or 5 cycles, that's a net loss.

Yes. Especially since the multiply will often end up more able to be
run in parallel with other things.

> But worrying about that is the reason I left provision for arch-specific
> hooks, and I'm already working on the first: the PA-RISC doesn't have
> an integer multiplier at all, although the FPU can do 32-bit integer
> multiplies.

Don't worry about pa-risc. There may be a handful of users, where even
"users" is more of a "boot up occasionally just for perverse fun"
rather than anything else.

That's true of at least half the architectures we support - the only
ones that really matter and where performance is a real isseu are
currently x86, arm and powerpc.

                  Linus