linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next 2/2] virtio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 02 Jun 2016 13:06:32 -0400
From:	Aaron Conole <aconole@...hat.com>
To:	Rick Jones <rick.jones2@....com>
Cc:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 2/2] virtio_net: Read the advised MTU


Hi Rick,

In the future, please don't cut the list.

Rick Jones <rick.jones2@....com> writes:

> On 06/02/2016 08:43 AM, Aaron Conole wrote:
>> This patch checks the feature bit for the VIRTIO_NET_F_MTU feature. If it
>> exists, read the advised MTU and use it.
>>
>> No proper error handling is provided for the case where a user changes the
>> negotiated MTU. A future commit will add proper error handling. Instead, a
>> warning is emitted if the guest changes the device MTU after previously
>> being given advice.
>
> One of the things I've been doing has been setting-up a cluster
> (OpenStack) with JumboFrames, and then setting MTUs on instance vNICs
> by hand to measure different MTU sizes.  It would be a shame if such a
> thing were not possible in the future.  Keeping a warning if shrinking
> the MTU would be good, leave the error (perhaps) to if an attempt is
> made to go beyond the advised value.

This was cut because it didn't make sense for such a warning to
be issued, but it seems like perhaps you may want such a feature?  I
agree with Michael, after thinking about it, that I don't know what sort
of use the warning would serve.  After all, if you're changing the MTU,
you must have wanted such a change to occur?

-Aaron

> happy benchmarking,
>
> rick jones