[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57506B31.2010600@broadcom.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 10:21:53 -0700
From: Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
Cc: Ray Jui <ray.jui@...adcom.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>, Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>,
Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
"open list:BROADCOM BCM281XX/BCM11XXX/BCM216XX ARM ARCHITE..."
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
"moderated list:ARM SUB-ARCHITECTURES"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/32] arm64: Add platform selection for BCM2835.
On 16-06-02 10:12 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> There is no need to add ARCH_BCM though?
>
> There are Makefile(s) with
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_BCM) += bcm/
>
> in drivers/pinctrl for example, maybe more, didn't check the whole tree.
>
> So without ARCH_BCM some drivers are dropped from the build ...
I see that now. Quite bizarre how the NS2 pinctl driver (used on a
arm64 SoC) gets built right now....
Yes, adding the select with hidden option seems like what needs to be
done. The ARM Maintainers did not like multi-level ARCH_BCM being added
in the arm64 Kconfig previously so we dropped it.
>
> cheers,
> Gerd
>
Thanks,
Scott
Powered by blists - more mailing lists