linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] zram: use crypto api to check alg availability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160602024045.GA3024@bbox>
Date:	Thu, 2 Jun 2016 11:40:45 +0900
From:	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
To:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
CC:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] zram: use crypto api to check alg availability

On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 04:48:45PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (06/01/16 15:47), Minchan Kim wrote:
> [..]
> > > so both BUILTIN and BUILT-AS-A-MODULE cases are handled at compile
> > > time now and we can avoid crypto_has_comp() checks for most of the
> > > comp_algorithm calls, except for the case when someone requests an
> > > out-of-tree module.
> > 
> > Hmm, isn't it problem, either?
> > 
> > That module was built but not installed. In that case, setting the
> > algorithm will be failed. IOW, we are lying to user.
> 
> have you ever seen this? really, why should we even bother?
> if there is no requested algorithm we will fallback to LZO.

Yeb, it seems I am too paranoid. Let's not take care about the case.
We can simple return -EINVAL and fallback lzo.

Thanks.