| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1464926139-58252-3-git-send-email-jaegeuk@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 20:55:34 -0700 From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org> Subject: [PATCH 3/8] f2fs: avoid wrong count on dirty inodes The number should be covered by spin_lock. Otherwise we can see wrong count in f2fs_stat. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org> --- fs/f2fs/super.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c index 27f76819e..9e75433 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c @@ -645,8 +645,8 @@ static void f2fs_dirty_inode(struct inode *inode, int flags) list_add_tail(&F2FS_I(inode)->gdirty_list, &sbi->inode_list[DIRTY_META]); inc_page_count(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_IMETA); - spin_unlock(&sbi->inode_lock[DIRTY_META]); stat_inc_dirty_inode(sbi, DIRTY_META); + spin_unlock(&sbi->inode_lock[DIRTY_META]); } void f2fs_inode_synced(struct inode *inode) @@ -662,8 +662,8 @@ void f2fs_inode_synced(struct inode *inode) clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_DIRTY_INODE); clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_AUTO_RECOVER); dec_page_count(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_IMETA); - spin_unlock(&sbi->inode_lock[DIRTY_META]); stat_dec_dirty_inode(F2FS_I_SB(inode), DIRTY_META); + spin_unlock(&sbi->inode_lock[DIRTY_META]); } static void f2fs_i_callback(struct rcu_head *head) -- 2.6.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists