linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Quiet noisy LSM denial when accessing net sysctl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.20.1606031100260.18314@namei.org>
Date:	Fri, 3 Jun 2016 11:00:36 +1000 (AEST)
From:	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
To:	Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...onical.com>
cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, serge.hallyn@...onical.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Quiet noisy LSM denial when accessing net sysctl

On Thu, 2 Jun 2016, Tyler Hicks wrote:

> On 05/17/2016 09:13 AM, Tyler Hicks wrote:
> > On 05/08/2016 10:56 PM, David Miller wrote:
> >> From: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...onical.com>
> >> Date: Fri,  6 May 2016 18:04:12 -0500
> >>
> >>> This pair of patches does away with what I believe is a useless denial
> >>> audit message when a privileged process initially accesses a net sysctl.
> >>
> >> The LSM folks can apply this if they agree with you.
> > 
> > Hi James - Could you pick up these two bug fix patches? Thanks!
> 
> Hello - Just checking in again to see if you plan on taking these
> through the security tree?

Sure, please resend.

-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@...ei.org>