[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABb+yY2aOncqM-fOiq_ZBink0Fth6Drd30ZMe3-bXNkodW2dVA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 18:41:52 +0530
From: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>
To: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Cc: Horng-Shyang Liao <hs.liao@...iatek.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, srv_heupstream@...iatek.com,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@...omium.org>,
CK HU <ck.hu@...iatek.com>,
cawa cheng <cawa.cheng@...iatek.com>,
Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@...iatek.com>,
YT Shen <yt.shen@...iatek.com>,
Daoyuan Huang <daoyuan.huang@...iatek.com>,
Damon Chu <damon.chu@...iatek.com>,
Josh-YC Liu <josh-yc.liu@...iatek.com>,
Glory Hung <glory.hung@...iatek.com>,
Jiaguang Zhang <jiaguang.zhang@...iatek.com>,
Dennis-YC Hsieh <dennis-yc.hsieh@...iatek.com>,
Monica Wang <monica.wang@...iatek.com>,
Jaswinder Singh <jaswinder.singh@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/3] CMDQ: Mediatek CMDQ driver
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com> wrote:
> On 03/06/16 08:12, Horng-Shyang Liao wrote:
>> On Thu, 2016-06-02 at 10:46 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>> I keep thinking about how to get rid of the two data structures,
>>> task_busy_list and the task_release_wq. We need the latter for the only
>>> sake of getting a timeout.
>>>
>>> Did you have a look on how the mailbox framework handles this?
>>> By the way, what is the reason to not implement the whole driver as a
>>> mailbox controller? For me, this driver looks like a good fit.
>>
>>
>> CMDQ needs to encode commands for GCE hardware. We think this behavior
>> should be put in CMDQ driver, and client just call CMDQ functions.
>> Therefore, if we want to use mailbox framework, cmdq_rec must be
>> mailbox client, and the others must be mailbox controller.
>>
>
> You mean the functions to fill the cmdq_rec and execute it?
> I think this should be part of the driver.
>
> Jassi, can you have a look on the interface this driver exports [0].
> They are needed to actually create the message which will be send.
> Could something like this be part of a mailbox driver?
>
> [0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9140221/
>
Packet creating/parsing should not be a part of controller driver. As
the log of this patch says, today it is used for only display but in
future it could work with other h/w as well, so it makes sense to have
mailbox api do the message queuing, the controller driver do the
send/receive and client drivers implement display and other h/w
specific packaging of data (protocol handling).
So yes, I think this could use mailbox api.
Cheers.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists