lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5751863E.907@roeck-us.net>
Date:	Fri, 3 Jun 2016 06:29:34 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
	corbet@....net, lars@...afoo.de
Cc:	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] iio: adc: ina3221: Add support for IIO ADC driver for
 TI INA3221

On 06/03/2016 03:06 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 01/06/16 13:34, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>> The INA3221 is a three-channel, high-side current and bus voltage monitor
>> with an I2C interface from Texas Instruments. The INA3221 monitors both
>> shunt voltage drops and bus supply voltages in addition to having
>> programmable conversion times and averaging modes for these signals.
>> The INA3221 offers both critical and warning alerts to detect multiple
>> programmable out-of-range conditions for each channel.
>>
>> Add support for INA3221 SW driver via IIO ADC interface. The device is
>> register as iio-device and provides interface for voltage/current and power
>> monitor. Also provide interface for setting oneshot/continuous mode and
>> critical/warning threshold for the shunt voltage drop.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
> Hi Laxman,
>
> As ever with any driver lying on the border of IIO and hwmon, please include
> a short justification of why you need an IIO driver and also cc the
> hwmon list + maintainers. (cc'd on this reply).
>
> I simply won't take a driver where the hwmon maintainers aren't happy.
> As it stands I'm not seeing obvious reasons in the code for why this
> should be an IIO device.
>

Me not either.

I have a hwmon driver for the same chip pending from Andrew Davis (TI)
which I am just about to accept. We had directed Andrew back in April
to write a hwmon driver for the chip, which he did.

Guenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ