[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160603133920.GA3913@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 15:39:20 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
"linux-x86_64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-x86_64@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: x86 memory barrier: why does Linux prefer MFENCE to Locked ADD?
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 11:05:43AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >> latest version here:
> >>
> >> lkml.kernel.org/r/1453921746-16178-1-git-send-email-mst@...hat.comZ
> >
> >It's ready as far as I am concerned.
> >Basically we are just waiting for ack from hpa.
>
> And I'm still discussing this with the hardware people. It seems we
> can do this for *most* things, but not all; the question is where
> exactly we need to do something different.
Anything on this?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists