linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] Axi-usb: Add support for 64-bit addressing.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 3 Jun 2016 20:46:08 +0530
From:	Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@...il.com>
To:	Nava kishore Manne <nava.manne@...inx.com>
Cc:	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Michal Simek <michals@...inx.com>,
	Soren Brinkmann <sorenb@...inx.com>,
	"balbi@...com" <balbi@...com>,
	"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Hyun Kwon <hyunk@...inx.com>,
	Radhey Shyam Pandey <radheys@...inx.com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Axi-usb: Add support for 64-bit addressing.

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 10:45 AM, Nava kishore Manne
<nava.manne@...inx.com> wrote:
> Hi Shubhrajyoti,
>
>
>         Thanks for the review...
>
>> >  /**
>> > + * xudc_write64 - write 64bit value to device registers
>> > + * @ep: pointer to the usb device endpoint structure.
>> > + * @offset: register offset
>> > + * @val: data to be written
>> > + **/
>> > +static void xudc_write64(struct xusb_ep *ep, u32 offset, u64 val) {
>> > +       struct xusb_udc *udc = ep->udc;
>> > +
>> > +       udc->write_fn(udc->addr, offset, lower_32_bits(val));
>> > +       udc->write_fn(udc->addr, offset+0x04, upper_32_bits(val));
>>
>> can we move this to a single 64 bit write?
>
> Initially I sent the patches with writeq() ,lo_hi_writeq()  later we decided to replace with write_fun().
> The reason for this is lo_hi_writeq() always assumes a little-endian register, so it's broken if anyone builds this device with big-endian registers.
> So replaced the 64bit calls with write_fun() as suggested by Arnd Bergmann. Hope it clears your query.
> Please refer to the below thread
>
>         http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1604.2/02046.html

missed that discurssion.

thanks
>
>
> Regards,
> Navakishore.
>