[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160603184819.GE3693@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 20:48:19 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Jason Low <jason.low2@....com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Terry Rudd <terry.rudd@....com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@....com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] locking/rwsem: Convert rwsem count to
atomic_long_t
On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 11:09:54AM -0700, Jason Low wrote:
> arch/alpha/include/asm/rwsem.h | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
> arch/ia64/include/asm/rwsem.h | 20 ++++++++++----------
So I was looking at rm arch/*/include/asm/rwsem.h :-) Because at the end
of the day you're reimplementing atomic bits.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists