lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160603142711.010cc464@lwn.net>
Date:	Fri, 3 Jun 2016 14:27:11 -0600
From:	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Cc:	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>,
	Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@...marit.de>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
	Dan Allen <dan@...ndevise.io>,
	Russel Winder <russel@...der.org.uk>,
	Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Documentation/Sphinx

On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 22:24:03 +0200
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch> wrote:

> > This is maybe a job for a separate tool.  A related issue is the (fairly
> > frequent) "oh look, none of the comments in $FILE are being used"
> > realization that seems to happen fairly often.  It would be nice to check
> > for that, but that's going to be hard to shoehorn into Sphinx.  
> 
> I think much more valuable would be a tool that checks whether
> comments are pulled in anywhere (for a given source file), over the
> entire tree. Very often entire subsystems carg-cult kernel-doc, but
> never use it in a .tmpl, which means 0-day won't notice, and neither
> anyone else.

That is kind of what I was trying to get at, yes :)

jon

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ