[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160603142711.010cc464@lwn.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 14:27:11 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>,
Markus Heiser <markus.heiser@...marit.de>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
Dan Allen <dan@...ndevise.io>,
Russel Winder <russel@...der.org.uk>,
Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Documentation/Sphinx
On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 22:24:03 +0200
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch> wrote:
> > This is maybe a job for a separate tool. A related issue is the (fairly
> > frequent) "oh look, none of the comments in $FILE are being used"
> > realization that seems to happen fairly often. It would be nice to check
> > for that, but that's going to be hard to shoehorn into Sphinx.
>
> I think much more valuable would be a tool that checks whether
> comments are pulled in anywhere (for a given source file), over the
> entire tree. Very often entire subsystems carg-cult kernel-doc, but
> never use it in a .tmpl, which means 0-day won't notice, and neither
> anyone else.
That is kind of what I was trying to get at, yes :)
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists