[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160604135010.4066a7a6@wiggum>
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2016 13:50:10 +0200
From: Michael Büsch <m@...s.ch>
To: Hugh Sipière <hgsipiere@...il.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: ssb: Fix comments to suit coding style
On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 12:32:13 +0100
Hugh Sipière <hgsipiere@...il.com> wrote:
> I changed it so that these two comments do not end on a line with text.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Sipière <hgsipiere@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/ssb/driver_gpio.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ssb/driver_gpio.c b/drivers/ssb/driver_gpio.c
> index 180e027..f2435f3 100644
> --- a/drivers/ssb/driver_gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/ssb/driver_gpio.c
> @@ -231,7 +231,8 @@ static int ssb_gpio_chipco_init(struct ssb_bus *bus)
> chip->ngpio = 16;
> /* There is just one SoC in one device and its GPIO addresses should be
> * deterministic to address them more easily. The other buses could get
> - * a random base number. */
> + * a random base number.
> + */
> if (bus->bustype == SSB_BUSTYPE_SSB)
> chip->base = 0;
> else
> @@ -424,7 +425,8 @@ static int ssb_gpio_extif_init(struct ssb_bus *bus)
> chip->ngpio = 5;
> /* There is just one SoC in one device and its GPIO addresses should be
> * deterministic to address them more easily. The other buses could get
> - * a random base number. */
> + * a random base number.
> + */
> if (bus->bustype == SSB_BUSTYPE_SSB)
> chip->base = 0;
> else
What's the benefit from this change?
Will the next person submit a patch to remove wasted lines that just
contain a */?
--
Michael
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists