[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160604105335.5c47ce64@arm.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2016 10:53:35 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"Pawel Moll" <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"Stephen Warren" <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 4/9] genirq: Add runtime power management support for
IRQ chips
On Thu, 12 May 2016 16:19:27 +0100
Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com> wrote:
> Some IRQ chips may be located in a power domain outside of the CPU
> subsystem and hence will require device specific runtime power
> management. In order to support such IRQ chips, add a pointer for a
> device structure to the irq_chip structure, and if this pointer is
> populated by the IRQ chip driver and CONFIG_PM is selected in the kernel
> configuration, then the pm_runtime_get/put APIs for this chip will be
> called when an IRQ is requested/freed, respectively.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists