[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160605102601.GC31708@htj.duckdns.org>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 06:26:01 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Bhaktipriya Shridhar <bhaktipriya96@...il.com>
Cc: Derek Chickles <derek.chickles@...iumnetworks.com>,
Satanand Burla <satananda.burla@...iumnetworks.com>,
Felix Manlunas <felix.manlunas@...iumnetworks.com>,
Raghu Vatsavayi <raghu.vatsavayi@...iumnetworks.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ethernet: cavium: liquidio: request_manager: Remove
create_workqueue
On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 08:54:00PM +0530, Bhaktipriya Shridhar wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/request_manager.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/request_manager.c
> index a2a2465..9313915 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/request_manager.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/cavium/liquidio/request_manager.c
> @@ -144,7 +144,9 @@ int octeon_init_instr_queue(struct octeon_device *oct,
>
> oct->fn_list.setup_iq_regs(oct, iq_no);
>
> - oct->check_db_wq[iq_no].wq = create_workqueue("check_iq_db");
> + oct->check_db_wq[iq_no].wq = alloc_workqueue("check_iq_db",
> + WQ_MEM_RECLAIM,
> + 0);
Why the new line between WQ_MEM_RECLAIM and 0?
Except for the subj tag and the above nit,
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Thanks.
--
tejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists