linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.10 067/143] farsync: fix off-by-one bug in fst_add

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1465122046-9645-68-git-send-email-w@1wt.eu>
Date:	Sun,  5 Jun 2016 12:19:30 +0200
From:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Subject: [PATCH 3.10 067/143] farsync: fix off-by-one bug in fst_add_one

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

commit e725a66c0202b5f36c2f9d59d26a65c53bbf21f7 upstream.

gcc-6 finds an out of bounds access in the fst_add_one function
when calculating the end of the mmio area:

drivers/net/wan/farsync.c: In function 'fst_add_one':
drivers/net/wan/farsync.c:418:53: error: index 2 denotes an offset greater than size of 'u8[2][8192] {aka unsigned char[2][8192]}' [-Werror=array-bounds]
 #define BUF_OFFSET(X)   (BFM_BASE + offsetof(struct buf_window, X))
                                                     ^
include/linux/compiler-gcc.h:158:21: note: in definition of macro '__compiler_offsetof'
  __builtin_offsetof(a, b)
                     ^
drivers/net/wan/farsync.c:418:37: note: in expansion of macro 'offsetof'
 #define BUF_OFFSET(X)   (BFM_BASE + offsetof(struct buf_window, X))
                                     ^~~~~~~~
drivers/net/wan/farsync.c:2519:36: note: in expansion of macro 'BUF_OFFSET'
                                  + BUF_OFFSET ( txBuffer[i][NUM_TX_BUFFER][0]);
                                    ^~~~~~~~~~

The warning is correct, but not critical because this appears
to be a write-only variable that is set by each WAN driver but
never accessed afterwards.

I'm taking the minimal fix here, using the correct pointer by
pointing 'mem_end' to the last byte inside of the register area
as all other WAN drivers do, rather than the first byte outside of
it. An alternative would be to just remove the mem_end member
entirely.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
---
 drivers/net/wan/farsync.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wan/farsync.c b/drivers/net/wan/farsync.c
index bcfff0d..2dfa147 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wan/farsync.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wan/farsync.c
@@ -2545,7 +2545,7 @@ fst_add_one(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *ent)
                 dev->mem_start   = card->phys_mem
                                  + BUF_OFFSET ( txBuffer[i][0][0]);
                 dev->mem_end     = card->phys_mem
-                                 + BUF_OFFSET ( txBuffer[i][NUM_TX_BUFFER][0]);
+                                 + BUF_OFFSET ( txBuffer[i][NUM_TX_BUFFER - 1][LEN_RX_BUFFER - 1]);
                 dev->base_addr   = card->pci_conf;
                 dev->irq         = card->irq;
 
-- 
2.8.0.rc2.1.gbe9624a