[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160605214421.384462733@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 14:44:30 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.6 118/121] xfs: fix inode validity check in xfs_iflush_cluster
4.6-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
commit 51b07f30a71c27405259a0248206ed4e22adbee2 upstream.
Some careless idiot(*) wrote crap code in commit 1a3e8f3 ("xfs:
convert inode cache lookups to use RCU locking") back in late 2010,
and so xfs_iflush_cluster checks the wrong inode for whether it is
still valid under RCU protection. Fix it to lock and check the
correct inode.
(*) Careless-idiot: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
Discovered-by: Brain Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
@@ -3205,13 +3205,13 @@ xfs_iflush_cluster(
* We need to check under the i_flags_lock for a valid inode
* here. Skip it if it is not valid or the wrong inode.
*/
- spin_lock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
- if (!ip->i_ino ||
+ spin_lock(&iq->i_flags_lock);
+ if (!iq->i_ino ||
(XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(mp, iq->i_ino) & mask) != first_index) {
- spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&iq->i_flags_lock);
continue;
}
- spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
+ spin_unlock(&iq->i_flags_lock);
/*
* Do an un-protected check to see if the inode is dirty and
Powered by blists - more mailing lists