lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160605222324.596368278@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Sun,  5 Jun 2016 15:24:21 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.5 106/128] xfs: fix inode validity check in xfs_iflush_cluster

4.5-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>

commit 51b07f30a71c27405259a0248206ed4e22adbee2 upstream.

Some careless idiot(*) wrote crap code in commit 1a3e8f3 ("xfs:
convert inode cache lookups to use RCU locking") back in late 2010,
and so xfs_iflush_cluster checks the wrong inode for whether it is
still valid under RCU protection. Fix it to lock and check the
correct inode.

(*) Careless-idiot: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>

Discovered-by: Brain Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
@@ -3225,13 +3225,13 @@ xfs_iflush_cluster(
 		 * We need to check under the i_flags_lock for a valid inode
 		 * here. Skip it if it is not valid or the wrong inode.
 		 */
-		spin_lock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
-		if (!ip->i_ino ||
+		spin_lock(&iq->i_flags_lock);
+		if (!iq->i_ino ||
 		    (XFS_INO_TO_AGINO(mp, iq->i_ino) & mask) != first_index) {
-			spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
+			spin_unlock(&iq->i_flags_lock);
 			continue;
 		}
-		spin_unlock(&ip->i_flags_lock);
+		spin_unlock(&iq->i_flags_lock);
 
 		/*
 		 * Do an un-protected check to see if the inode is dirty and


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ