linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2] sched: reflect sched_entity movement into task

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 6 Jun 2016 07:58:54 +0800
From:	Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, mingo@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pjt@...gle.com,
	dietmar.eggemann@....com, bsegall@...gle.com,
	Morten.Rasmussen@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] sched: reflect sched_entity movement into
 task_group's utilization

On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 02:54:07PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:57:32AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > Ensure that the changes of the utilization of a sched_entity will be
> > reflected in the task_group hierarchy.
> > 
> > This patch tries another way than the flat utilization hierarchy proposal
> > to ensure the changes will be propagated down to the root cfs.
> 
> Which would be:
> 
>  lkml.kernel.org/r/1460327765-18024-5-git-send-email-yuyang.du@...el.com
> 
> Right? Yuyang, there were some issues with the patches leading up to
> that proposal, were you going to update the flat util thing without
> those patches or can you find yourself in Vince's patches?

Sure. I am rebasing my proposal patches, will send out later.
 
> (just so I can get a picture of what all patches to look at when
> reviewing)