linux-kernel - Re: 4.7-rc1/s390: WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 1 at kernel/events/core.c:8485 perf_pmu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 6 Jun 2016 12:29:00 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
	linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org >> Linux Kernel Mailing List" 
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 4.7-rc1/s390: WARNING: CPU: 5 PID: 1 at
 kernel/events/core.c:8485 perf_pmu_register+0x420/0x428

On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 11:29:36AM +0200, Hendrik Brueckner wrote:

> > > Looks like perf_pmu_register does not like to be called twice (once for the counter
> > > and once for the sampling facility).
> > 
> > Twice isn't the problem per se, its trying to register two PMUs for
> > perf_hw_context that is the problem.
> > 
> > The perf core does not expect or deal well with that.
> > 
> > The perf core expects a single HW PMU in that when it schedules
> > hw_context events, and encounters an failure to pmu::add() (because the
> > hw pmu is 'full') it stops trying to add more events.
> 
> On s390, there are actually two distinct measurement facilities and, thus,
> two HW PMUs for each.  There is the hardware counter and hardware sampling
> facility/PMU.

Can you quickly describe the cf one; or provide a link to a document
doing so?

If this is a simple always running counter without interrupt you could
make it a 'software' PMU which can always schedule, similar to the x86
MSR driver (arch/x86/events/msr.c).