lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 21:14:26 +1000 (AEST) From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [v2] powerpc: spinlock: Fix spin_unlock_wait() On Fri, 2016-03-06 at 03:49:48 UTC, Boqun Feng wrote: > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h > index 523673d7583c..2ed893662866 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/spinlock.h > @@ -64,6 +64,25 @@ static inline int arch_spin_is_locked(arch_spinlock_t *lock) > } > > /* > + * Use a ll/sc loop to read the lock value, the STORE part of this operation is > + * used for making later lock operation observe it. > + */ > +static inline bool arch_spin_is_locked_sync(arch_spinlock_t *lock) > +{ > + arch_spinlock_t tmp; > + > + __asm__ __volatile__( > +"1: " PPC_LWARX(%0, 0, %2, 1) "\n" As discussed offline I think we want to use EH=0 here (the final parameter). >From the ISA: The value of EH provides a hint as to whether the program will perform a subsequent store to the word in storage addressed by EA before some other processor attempts to modify it. 0 Other programs might attempt to modify the word in storage addressed by EA regardless of the result of the corresponding stwcx. instruction. cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists