linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] MIPS: BMIPS: Add BCM6345 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160606135834.GA28996@rob-hp-laptop>
Date:	Mon, 6 Jun 2016 08:58:34 -0500
From:	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:	Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
	f.fainelli@...il.com, jogo@...nwrt.org, cernekee@...il.com,
	simon@...e.lp0.eu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] MIPS: BMIPS: Add BCM6345 support

On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 10:12:03AM +0200, Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote:
> BCM6345 has only one CPU, so SMP support must be disabled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@...il.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/brcm/soc.txt | 2 +-
>  arch/mips/bmips/setup.c                             | 9 +++++++++
>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/brcm/soc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/brcm/soc.txt
> index 4a7e030..1936e8a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/brcm/soc.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/brcm/soc.txt
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Required properties:
>  
>  - compatible: "brcm,bcm3384", "brcm,bcm33843"
>                "brcm,bcm3384-viper", "brcm,bcm33843-viper"
> -              "brcm,bcm6328", "brcm,bcm6358", "brcm,bcm6368",
> +              "brcm,bcm6328", "brcm,bcm6345", "brcm,bcm6358", "brcm,bcm6368",
>                "brcm,bcm63168", "brcm,bcm63268",
>                "brcm,bcm7125", "brcm,bcm7346", "brcm,bcm7358", "brcm,bcm7360",
>                "brcm,bcm7362", "brcm,bcm7420", "brcm,bcm7425"

Are these all mutually exclusive? Please make that clear.