[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 12:58:22 +0900
From: Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
To: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc: laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com, geert+renesas@...der.be,
joro@...tes.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, horms+renesas@...ge.net.au,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 06/11] iommu/ipmmu-vmsa: Teach xlate() to skip disabled iommus
From: Magnus Damm <damm+renesas@...nsource.se>
The ->xlate() call gets invoked even though the iommu
device has status = "disabled" in DT, so make sure we
skip over disabled devices.
In my mind it would make sense to have this at some
shared level, but I guess some users may want to
configure the iommu regardless of DT state.
Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm+renesas@...nsource.se>
---
Changes since V1:
- Reworked slightly to fit on top of updated patch order
drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- 0017/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c
+++ work/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c 2016-06-06 10:58:18.530607110 +0900
@@ -1001,7 +1001,13 @@ static struct iommu_group *ipmmu_device_
static int ipmmu_of_xlate_dma(struct device *dev,
struct of_phandle_args *spec)
{
- /* dummy callback to satisfy of_iommu_configure() */
+ /* If the IPMMU device is disabled in DT then return error
+ * to make sure the of_iommu code does not install ops
+ * even though the iommu device is disabled
+ */
+ if (!of_device_is_available(spec->np))
+ return -ENODEV;
+
return 0;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists