lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 6 Jun 2016 18:05:15 +0100
From:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To:	Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@...il.com>
Cc:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Yang Shi <yang.shi@...aro.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] arm64: bpf: optimize JMP_CALL

On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 03:00:29PM -0700, Zi Shen Lim wrote:
> Remove superfluous stack frame, saving us 3 instructions for
> every JMP_CALL.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@...il.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 3 ---
>  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> index 51abc97..7ae304e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
> @@ -578,11 +578,8 @@ emit_cond_jmp:
>  		const u64 func = (u64)__bpf_call_base + imm;
>  
>  		emit_a64_mov_i64(tmp, func, ctx);
> -		emit(A64_PUSH(A64_FP, A64_LR, A64_SP), ctx);
> -		emit(A64_MOV(1, A64_FP, A64_SP), ctx);
>  		emit(A64_BLR(tmp), ctx);
>  		emit(A64_MOV(1, r0, A64_R(0)), ctx);
> -		emit(A64_POP(A64_FP, A64_LR, A64_SP), ctx);
>  		break;
>  	}

Is the jitted code intended to be unwindable by standard tools?

Will

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ