linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.10 000/143] 3.10.102-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <575662BF.6070809@roeck-us.net>
Date:	Mon, 6 Jun 2016 22:59:27 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10 000/143] 3.10.102-stable review

On 06/06/2016 10:17 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 09:30:11PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>> Do you have a repository, either with the patch
>>>> series or with the to-be-tested branch, where the builder could
>>>> pick it up ?
>>>
>>> I don't but I can set something up for you. Would you be OK with a
>>> branch in my account (eg: "3.10-for-guenter") which I "git push -f"
>>> from my local branch ? That way you always pull from the same branch
>>> and we don't care if patches are removed during the process. Just let
>>> me know. Otherwise let me know if a different form is desired.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, that would be excellent. I would suggest to name it something like
>> stable-3.10-queue, though, to be a bit more generic. After all, other
>> testers will want to pick it up as well.
>
> Well, for me it would not be a "queue" in the sense of how Greg maintains
> it but more a release candidate derived from the last 3.10 tag. Basically
> if nothing changes between the review and the release, it will just get
> an extra commit which is the release tag. If I produce it just for your
> use case and you're fine with a force-pushed branch, I'd rather avoid to
> confuse other people who probably have no business using it.
>

Jiri provides a branch for 3.12, exactly as you suggested. In his case it is
named stable-3.12-queue. Sasha does the same, with linux-3.18.y-queue and
linux-4.1.y-queue. Both force-push as needed. I don't see a problem with it.
Other testers such as kernelci.org pick it up from there (or from my repository
after I pull it in). In my repository, all branches are named linux-<release>.y.queue;
for example, the 3.10 branch in my repository is named linux-3.10.y.queue.
Those branches are also force-pushed when updated.

Having said that, as long as you make it available, please feel free to name
the branch as you like.

Thanks,
Guenter