[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160607062650.GA12305@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 08:26:50 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, rientjes@...gle.com, oleg@...hat.com,
vdavydov@...allels.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 10/10] mm, oom: hide mm which is shared with kthread
or global init
On Mon 06-06-16 15:26:50, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> @@ -922,8 +941,17 @@ void oom_kill_process(struct oom_control *oc, struct task_struct *p,
> }
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
> - if (can_oom_reap)
> + if (can_oom_reap) {
> wake_oom_reaper(victim);
> + } else if (victim != current) {
> + /*
> + * If we want to guarantee a forward progress we cannot keep
> + * the oom victim TIF_MEMDIE here. Sleep for a while and then
> + * drop the flag to make sure another victim can be selected.
> + */
> + schedule_timeout_killable(HZ);
> + exit_oom_victim(victim);
thiking about it more, with the other change in the
oom_scan_process_thread we do not need to exit_oom_victim. In fact we
even shouldn't because of the oom_disabled synchronization. I will
respin the patch and drop the exit_oom_victim part.
schedule_timeout_killable will stay...
> + }
>
> mmdrop(mm);
> put_task_struct(victim);
> --
> 2.8.1
>
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists