[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160607064210.GA13671@packer-debian-8-amd64.digitalocean.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 02:42:10 -0400
From: Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...oraproject.org>
Subject: Re: Adding module support for __ro_after_init
+++ Rusty Russell [05/06/16 14:39 +0930]:
>Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com> writes:
>> Hi Rusty,
>>
>> I'd love to get your thoughts on the best way to support
>> __ro_after_init markings for modules. Are the r/o markings done after
>> module __init runs? If so, this should make things easy, and then we
>> just need to move .data..ro_after_init into .rodata at link time. If
>> not, then we'd need to explicitly make this section read-only after
>> _init.
>
>As you might expect, the sections are made read-only before anything
>runs. We'll need to do the latter, which means it needs to be
>page-aligned. (Well we could put it in the same page as .rodata, and
>just not protect that fully until after init).
Hi Rusty, Kees, :-)
Right, RO protection is enabled in load_module() before module __init gets to
run. So I guess there are two ways to go about this: either (1) keep
__ro_after_init with the rest of rodata and toggle RO protection after __init
runs, but I think we'd probably want to keep this protection before anything
executes. Or (2) modify layout_sections() in the module loader to place
.data..ro_after_init data in its own set of page(s) so that we can toggle RO
on/off independently of the other module sections, and set them to RO only
after module init runs.
So perhaps the modified module memory layout might look like..
[text] [rodata] [ro after init] [writable data]
I don't think (2) should be hard to implement in the module loader (well,
at first glance :-), maybe I'm missing something), but I could go ahead and
give a patch a shot.
Jessica
Powered by blists - more mailing lists