[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57566E05.2080209@kyup.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 09:47:33 +0300
From: Nikolay Borisov <kernel@...p.com>
To: Wei Tang <tangwei@...s.chinamobile.com>, john@...nmccutchan.com,
rlove@...ve.org, eparis@...isplace.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fsnotify: do not initialise statics to false
On 06/07/2016 05:17 AM, Wei Tang wrote:
> This patch fixes the checkpatch.pl error to inotify_fsnotify.c:
>
> ERROR: do not initialise statics to false
So if a variable is declared as static this means it's going to live in
the BSS which is zeroed out on load. So implicitly it is going to be 0,
however I think this is a subtle detail. I personally rather have the
false there and live with the warning. Not everything that checkpatch
reports must be fixed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Tang <tangwei@...s.chinamobile.com>
> ---
> fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c b/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c
> index 2cd900c..09c5393 100644
> --- a/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c
> +++ b/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c
> @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ static int idr_callback(int id, void *p, void *data)
> {
> struct fsnotify_mark *fsn_mark;
> struct inotify_inode_mark *i_mark;
> - static bool warned = false;
> + static bool warned;
>
> if (warned)
> return 0;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists