[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57567F8A.10603@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 11:02:18 +0300
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
To: Lothar Waßmann <LW@...O-electronics.de>
CC: Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
<linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] backlight: pwm_bl: disable PWM when 'duty_cycle' is zero
On 07/06/16 09:49, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 15:02:21 +0300 Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 06/06/16 13:44, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
>>> 'brightness' is usually an index into a table of duty_cycle values,
>>> where the value at index 0 may well be non-zero
>>> (tegra30-apalis-eval.dts and tegra30-colibri-eval-v3.dts are real-life
>>> examples).
>>> Thus brightness == 0 does not necessarily mean that the PWM output
>>> will be inactive.
>>> Check for 'duty_cycle == 0' rather than 'brightness == 0' to decide
>>> whether to disable the PWM.
>>
>> The binding doc does say:
>>
>> - brightness-levels: Array of distinct brightness levels. Typically these
>> are in the range from 0 to 255, but any range starting at 0 will do.
>> The actual brightness level (PWM duty cycle) will be interpolated
>> from these values. 0 means a 0% duty cycle (darkest/off), while the
>> last value in the array represents a 100% duty cycle (brightest).
>>
> So, what should I do, when I need a range of levels that doesn't start
> at 0? E.g. if the brightness is inverse proportional to the PWM duty
> cycle.
That's a question to the PWM/backlight maintainers, but I think in the
addition of your patch, the binding doc needs to be changed, as it
doesn't hold true after your patch.
Tomi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists