linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCHv2] usb: USB Type-C Connector Class

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160607082346.GA19620@kuha.fi.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 7 Jun 2016 11:23:46 +0300
From:	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
Cc:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
	Rajaram R <rajaram.officemail@...il.com>,
	Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>,
	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCHv2] usb: USB Type-C Connector Class

On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 03:35:35PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-06-06 at 16:28 +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> 
> > I would prefer lower case letters. I don't know the SIDs there are at
> > them moment, other then Display Port. Do you know them?
> > 
> > I don't think we can ever guarantee that in every case we will be able
> > to provide a human readable name for the alternate modes if they are
> > vendor defined. We will then potentially still have the names in two
> > different forms: "usbc0.displayport" and "usbc0.svid:xxxx". Is that
> > something acceptable to everybody?
> > 
> > I guess if it's not, then to only way to go forward would be to always
> > just use the svid in the name.
> 
> Yes, that is better. It makes more sense to use the number.
> We'd get into versioning problems if we use names.

OK, so we'll always use the svid in the name.

Thanks,

-- 
heikki