[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANRm+CxOJ-9WwxPOUaJOtc4dr+xgkLXWav8Zp-NgZYniA0VCOw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:16:30 +0800
From: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] KVM: fix steal clock warp during guest cpu hotplug
2016-06-07 18:39 GMT+08:00 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>:
>
>
> On 07/06/2016 09:59, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
>>
>> I observed that sometimes st is 100% instantaneous, then idle is 100%
>> even if there is a cpu hog on the guest cpu after the cpu hotplug comes
>> back(N.B. this can not always be readily reproduced). I add trace to
>> capture it as below:
>>
>> cpuhp/1-12 [001] d.h1 167.461657: account_process_tick: steal = 1291385514, prev_steal_time = 0
>> cpuhp/1-12 [001] d.h1 167.461659: account_process_tick: steal_jiffies = 1291
>> <idle>-0 [001] d.h1 167.462663: account_process_tick: steal = 18732255, prev_steal_time = 1291000000
>> <idle>-0 [001] d.h1 167.462664: account_process_tick: steal_jiffies = 18446744072437
>>
>> The steal clock warp and then steal_jiffies underflow.
>>
>> Rik also pointed out to me:
>>
>> | I have seen stuff like that with live migration too, in the past
>>
>> The root cause of steal clock warp during hotplug is kvm_steal_time reset
>> to 0 after cpu hotplug comes back which should be preexiting guest value.
>> This patch fix it by don't reset kvm_steal_time during guest cpu hotplug.
>
> Improved commit message:
>
> Sometimes, after CPU hotplug you can observe a spike in stolen time
> (100%) followed by the CPU being marked as 100% idle when it's actually
> busy with a CPU hog task. The trace looks like the following:
>
> cpuhp/1-12 [001] d.h1 167.461657: account_process_tick: steal = 1291385514, prev_steal_time = 0
> cpuhp/1-12 [001] d.h1 167.461659: account_process_tick: steal_jiffies = 1291
> <idle>-0 [001] d.h1 167.462663: account_process_tick: steal = 18732255, prev_steal_time = 1291000000
> <idle>-0 [001] d.h1 167.462664: account_process_tick: steal_jiffies = 18446744072437
>
> The sudden decrease of "steal" causes steal_jiffies to underflow.
> The root cause is kvm_steal_time being reset to 0 after hot-plugging
> back in a CPU. Instead, the preexisting value can be used, which is
> what the core scheduler code expects.
>
> John Stultz also reported a similar issue after guest S3.
> ------
>
> Please also add
>
> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Thanks Paolo! Your help is always a great appreciated. :)
Regards,
Wanpeng Li
Powered by blists - more mailing lists