linux-kernel - Re: powerpc/nvram: Fix an incorrect partition merge

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 07 Jun 2016 21:39:04 +1000
From:	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To:	xinhui <xinhui.pan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc:	Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
	Christophe Jaillet <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
	Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, tglx@...utronix.de,
	Nathan Fontenot <nfont@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: powerpc/nvram: Fix an incorrect partition merge

On Mon, 2016-06-06 at 13:31 +0800, xinhui wrote:
> On 2016年06月03日 19:47, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-10-12 at 07:30:02 UTC, xinhui wrote:
> > > From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > 
> > > When we merge two contiguous partitions whose signatures are marked
> > > NVRAM_SIG_FREE, We need update prev's length and checksum, then write it
> > > to nvram, not cur's. So lets fix this mistake now.
> > > 
> > > Also use memset instead of strncpy to set the partition's name. It's
> > > more readable if we want to fill up with duplicate chars .
> > 
> > Does this ever happen in practice? ie. should we backport the fix to stable
> > kernels?
> 
> I did not see that nvram warning in practice. BUT I suggest to backport it to stable kernel. :)
> 
> Let me recall the story. :)
> In past days, I was using pstore to keep some kernel logs. and sometimes I found my own logs and the panic logs did not show.
> pstore use a fixed-address reserved memory In x86 while nvram instead in ppc.
> 
> Then I spent some days to review the nvram codes.
> And worked out three patches to fix all issues that I found in nvram. BUT looks like I only sent out two of them. :)
> I lost the third patch maybe...

OK.

> > Has it always been broken?
> 
> no. after nvram partition corruption hit, all nvram partitions will be erased and re-alloc after the second machine reboot.
> I don't know who does it but i guess it is the firmware. :)

Actually I meant has the code always contained the bug, or was it added recently.

cheers