linux-kernel - Applied "regulator: pfuze100-regulator: Remove global variable" to the regulator tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <E1bAH3K-0001rg-Kt@debutante>
Date:	Tue, 07 Jun 2016 14:28:18 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>
Cc:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, broonie@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Applied "regulator: pfuze100-regulator: Remove global variable" to the regulator tree

The patch

   regulator: pfuze100-regulator: Remove global variable

has been applied to the regulator tree at

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From 124256548f4e7d3ff81a37a64acb439778bcdbfb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2016 19:17:38 -0300
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: pfuze100-regulator: Remove global variable

We should better not use a global 'struct pfuze_regulator' variable,
as this could cause problems if multiple regulator chips are used.

Place it inside the private struct instead.

Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c | 13 ++++++-------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c
index 2a44e5dd9c2a..bcdf9206f3ee 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/pfuze100-regulator.c
@@ -70,6 +70,7 @@ struct pfuze_chip {
 	struct device *dev;
 	struct pfuze_regulator regulator_descs[PFUZE100_MAX_REGULATOR];
 	struct regulator_dev *regulators[PFUZE100_MAX_REGULATOR];
+	struct pfuze_regulator *pfuze_regulators;
 };
 
 static const int pfuze100_swbst[] = {
@@ -334,8 +335,6 @@ static struct pfuze_regulator pfuze3000_regulators[] = {
 	PFUZE100_VGEN_REG(PFUZE3000, VLDO4, PFUZE100_VGEN6VOL, 1800000, 3300000, 100000),
 };
 
-static struct pfuze_regulator *pfuze_regulators;
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_OF
 /* PFUZE100 */
 static struct of_regulator_match pfuze100_matches[] = {
@@ -563,21 +562,21 @@ static int pfuze100_regulator_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
 	/* use the right regulators after identify the right device */
 	switch (pfuze_chip->chip_id) {
 	case PFUZE3000:
-		pfuze_regulators = pfuze3000_regulators;
+		pfuze_chip->pfuze_regulators = pfuze3000_regulators;
 		regulator_num = ARRAY_SIZE(pfuze3000_regulators);
 		sw_check_start = PFUZE3000_SW2;
 		sw_check_end = PFUZE3000_SW2;
 		sw_hi = 1 << 3;
 		break;
 	case PFUZE200:
-		pfuze_regulators = pfuze200_regulators;
+		pfuze_chip->pfuze_regulators = pfuze200_regulators;
 		regulator_num = ARRAY_SIZE(pfuze200_regulators);
 		sw_check_start = PFUZE200_SW2;
 		sw_check_end = PFUZE200_SW3B;
 		break;
 	case PFUZE100:
 	default:
-		pfuze_regulators = pfuze100_regulators;
+		pfuze_chip->pfuze_regulators = pfuze100_regulators;
 		regulator_num = ARRAY_SIZE(pfuze100_regulators);
 		sw_check_start = PFUZE100_SW2;
 		sw_check_end = PFUZE100_SW4;
@@ -587,7 +586,7 @@ static int pfuze100_regulator_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
 		(pfuze_chip->chip_id == PFUZE100) ? "100" :
 		((pfuze_chip->chip_id == PFUZE200) ? "200" : "3000"));
 
-	memcpy(pfuze_chip->regulator_descs, pfuze_regulators,
+	memcpy(pfuze_chip->regulator_descs, pfuze_chip->pfuze_regulators,
 		sizeof(pfuze_chip->regulator_descs));
 
 	ret = pfuze_parse_regulators_dt(pfuze_chip);
@@ -631,7 +630,7 @@ static int pfuze100_regulator_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
 			devm_regulator_register(&client->dev, desc, &config);
 		if (IS_ERR(pfuze_chip->regulators[i])) {
 			dev_err(&client->dev, "register regulator%s failed\n",
-				pfuze_regulators[i].desc.name);
+				pfuze_chip->pfuze_regulators[i].desc.name);
 			return PTR_ERR(pfuze_chip->regulators[i]);
 		}
 	}
-- 
2.8.1