linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] i2c-smbus: add support for HOST NOTIFY

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160607140145.GA19237@mail.corp.redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 7 Jun 2016 16:01:45 +0200
From:	Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
To:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc:	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>,
	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Andrew Duggan <aduggan@...aptics.com>,
	Christopher Heiny <cheiny@...aptics.com>,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] i2c-smbus: add support for HOST NOTIFY

Hi Wolfram,

On Jun 05 2016 or thereabouts, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi Benjamin,
> 
> > this is mostly a resubmission of the v6 with the acks, tested-by and few typos
> > here and there.
> 
> I actually reviewed v6 but got an NMI so writing the mails fell through
> the cracks :( Sorry about that! Good news is that the code is fine from
> my point of view, some documentation updates I'd request. After updating
> those, I will pick up the core patches right away. Note that while the

Great, many thanks!
The documentation fixes look simple enough to do. However, I just
realized a conflict in the i801 which requires tests (in the resume
call).

> i801 patch looks good to me, I need Jean's review here. There are other
> patches pending for i801, that needs to be coordinated by him.

OK. I'll try to fetch those pending patches on patchwork and see how the
merge would behave.

Cheers,
Benjamin

> 
> Thanks,
> 
>    Wolfram
>