linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/16] sched/fair: Optimize find_idlest

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160607142521.GB9187@e105550-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date:	Tue, 7 Jun 2016 15:25:21 +0100
From:	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	mingo@...hat.com, dietmar.eggemann@....com, yuyang.du@...el.com,
	vincent.guittot@...aro.org, mgalbraith@...e.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/16] sched/fair: Optimize find_idlest_cpu() when there
 is no choice

On Wed, Jun 01, 2016 at 09:59:20PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 11:58:46AM +0100, Morten Rasmussen wrote:
> > In the current find_idlest_group()/find_idlest_cpu() search we end up
> > calling find_idlest_cpu() in a sched_group containing only one cpu in
> > the end. Checking idle-states becomes pointless when there is no
> > alternative, so bail out instead.
> > 
> > cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> > cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>
> > ---
> >  kernel/sched/fair.c | 5 +++++
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > index 0fe3020..564215d 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > @@ -5155,6 +5155,11 @@ find_idlest_cpu(struct sched_group *group, struct task_struct *p, int this_cpu)
> >  	int shallowest_idle_cpu = -1;
> >  	int i;
> >  
> > +	/* Check if we have any choice */
> > +	if (group->group_weight == 1) {
> > +		return cpumask_first(sched_group_cpus(group));
> > +	}
> 
> superfluous brackets, also isn't @this_cpu supposed to be part of the
> sched_group_cpu(group) mask?

I'll kill the brackets.

IIUC, @this_cpu is never part of sched_group_cpus(group).
find_idlest_group() never returns the local group, so if we manage to
get to find_idlest_cpu(), the group would not contain @this_cpu.