lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 7 Jun 2016 12:14:28 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:	Hekuang <hekuang@...wei.com>
Cc:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, peterz@...radead.org,
	mingo@...hat.com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
	wangnan0@...wei.com, jpoimboe@...hat.com, ak@...ux.intel.com,
	eranian@...gle.com, namhyung@...nel.org, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
	sukadev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com,
	tumanova@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, kan.liang@...el.com,
	penberg@...nel.org, dsahern@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/14] Add support for remote unwind

Em Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 12:12:15PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 01:39:04PM +0800, Hekuang escreveu:
> > 在 2016/6/4 5:09, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 写道:
> > > Em Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 06:06:02PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > > > Anyway, please try your patchkit with 'perf top' and 'perf trace', as
> > > > both don't use perf.data files, i.e. they work 'live', so probably
> > > > things that you touch in normalize_arch() are not initialized and need
> > > > to be setup.
> > > Ah, no need to resend the whole patchkit, just find out what is the bug
> > > and send me a patch and I'll insert it at the right point to avoid
> > > introducing a bisect breaking point.
> 
> > > Your patchkit is in my perf/unwind branch at my tree, I already added
> > > Jiri's Acked-by in all the patches.
> 
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git
> 
> > I send the updated one after PATCH 10/14,  env->arch is null in live mode,
> > comments are added and "perf top/trace" works now.
> 
> Ok, now it fails 'perf test unwind' and I bisected it to:

Further info:

[root@...et ~]# perf test -v unwind
48: Test dwarf unwind                                        :
--- start ---
test child forked, pid 25078
got wrong number of stack entries 0 != 8
test child finished with -1
---- end ----
Test dwarf unwind: FAILED!
[root@...et ~]#
 
> [acme@...et linux]$ git bisect good
> e2b6ce1ca32cedeb2cef08f49aa812f0eadcc3c5 is the first bad commit
> commit e2b6ce1ca32cedeb2cef08f49aa812f0eadcc3c5
> Author: He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>
> Date:   Fri Jun 3 03:33:19 2016 +0000
> 
>     perf unwind: Check the target platform before assigning unwind methods
>     
>     Currently, 'perf script' uses host unwind methods to parse perf.data
>     callchain info without taking the target architecture into account, i.e.
>     assuming the perf.data file was generated on the same machine where the
>     analysis is being performed. So we get wrong result without any warnings
>     when unwinding callchains of x86(32-bit) on x86(64-bit) machine.
>     
>     This patch adds an extra step that checks the target platform before
>     assigning unwind methods. In later patches in this series, we can use
>     this info to assign the right unwind methods for supported platforms.
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ