[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160607034807.GB21466@vireshk-i7>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 09:18:07 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@...il.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>,
Steven Miao <realmz6@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/9] cpufreq: Sort policy->freq_table
On 06-06-16, 23:09, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Is there any particular reason why patches [2-7/9] are separate?
I just wanted them to be separately reviewable by platform driver owners.
Nothing else.
Will merge them in next version.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists