[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6abd6fd0-3a75-8569-95a4-174d856d0043@sandisk.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 10:01:01 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...disk.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, <axboe@...nel.dk>,
<keith.busch@...el.com>
CC: <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: NVMe over Fabrics target implementation
On 06/06/2016 02:22 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The target is configured using configfs, and configurable entities are:
> - NVMe subsystems and namespaces
> - NVMe over Fabrics ports and referrals
> - Host ACLs for primitive access control - NVMe over Fabrics access
> control is still work in progress at the specification level and
> will be implemented once that work has finished.
Hello Christoph,
As you know with configfs it is not allowed to create directories in the
configfs hierarchy from inside the kernel. This means that users will
have to create one directory per fabric port before configuring a target
port. Other virtual filesystems, e.g. sysfs, allow directory creation by
kernel drivers. This means that with sysfs the fabric port directory
could be created by the nvmet driver. Is this how you want the nvmet
driver to work?
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists