| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <57564DD3.3050601@roeck-us.net> Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 21:30:11 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10 000/143] 3.10.102-stable review Hi Willy, On 06/06/2016 09:09 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi Guenter, > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 08:46:57PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 12:18:23PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: >>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at : >>> https://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/stable-review/patch-3.10.102-rc1.gz >>> >> >> Hi Willy, >> >> my auto-builder can not pick up a stable release candidate from a >> tarball like this. > > I guess you mean from a patch, since it's a patch and not a tarball :-) > Whatever it is :-) >> Do you have a repository, either with the patch >> series or with the to-be-tested branch, where the builder could >> pick it up ? > > I don't but I can set something up for you. Would you be OK with a > branch in my account (eg: "3.10-for-guenter") which I "git push -f" > from my local branch ? That way you always pull from the same branch > and we don't care if patches are removed during the process. Just let > me know. Otherwise let me know if a different form is desired. > Yes, that would be excellent. I would suggest to name it something like stable-3.10-queue, though, to be a bit more generic. After all, other testers will want to pick it up as well. Thanks, Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists