linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Functional dependencies between devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160608173323.GN7510@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 8 Jun 2016 18:33:23 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.og>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
	Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@...labora.com>,
	Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...gle.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] Functional dependencies between devices

On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 07:24:15PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 02:52:11AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> >> What follows is my prototype implementation of this.  It took some time
> >> to develop (much more than I was hoping for), but here it goes at last.

> > Might be worth posting this outside the thread with CCs to people
> > working on system integration like SoC maintainers - I'd completely
> > missed this as it was buried and looked like the middle of an old
> > discussion.

> OK

> I can resend it afresh, but need to do some rework due to some changes
> that happened in the meantime.

Yeah, it looks like the actual patches didn't get much comment but
there's the constant grumbling about deferred probe which it'd be good
to resolve.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)