Message-ID: <VI1PR0401MB1709FCE3056C7E3E785BD2B8925E0@VI1PR0401MB1709.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:	Wed, 8 Jun 2016 04:56:13 +0000
From:	Po Liu <po.liu@....com>
To:	Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
CC:	Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>,
	Roy Zang <roy.zang@....com>, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@....com>,
	Minghuan Lian <minghuan.lian@....com>,
	Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@....com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Yang-Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] aer: add support aer interrupt with none
 MSI/MSI-X/INTx mode

Hi Bjorn,

Thanks for the kindly reply. All these are helpful.

>  From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:helgaas@...nel.org]
>  On Wed, June 08, 2016 6:47 AM
>  
>  On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 10:07:40AM +0000, Po Liu wrote:
>  > Hi Bjorn,
>  >
>  > >  -----Original Message-----
>  > >
>  > >  On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 10:01:44AM -0400, Murali Karicheri wrote:
>  > >  > On 06/06/2016 03:32 AM, Po Liu wrote:
>  > >  > > Hi Bjorn,
>  > >  > > I confirm we met same problem with KeyStone base on DesignWare
>  > > design.
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > > Best regards,
>  > >  > > Liu Po
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > >>  -----Original Message-----
>  > >  > >>  From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:helgaas@...nel.org]  > >>  Sent:
>  > > Saturday, June 04, 2016 11:49 AM  > >>  To: Murali Karicheri  > >>
>  > > Cc: Po Liu; linux-pci@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-  > >>
>  > > kernel@...ts.infradead.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;  > >>
>  > > devicetree@...r.kernel.org; Arnd Bergmann; Roy Zang; Marc Zyngier;
>  > > > >> Stuart Yoder; Yang-Leo Li; Minghuan Lian; Bjorn Helgaas; Shawn
>  > > Guo;  > >> Mingkai Hu; Rob Herring  > >>  Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2]
>  > > aer: add support aer interrupt with none  > >> MSI/MSI-X/INTx mode
>  > > > >>  > >>  On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 01:31:11PM -0400, Murali
>  > > Karicheri wrote:
>  > >  > >>  > Po,
>  > >  > >>  >
>  > >  > >>  > Sorry to hijack your discussion, but the problem seems to
>  > > be  > >> same for  > Keystone PCI controller which is also
>  > > designware (old
>  > >  version) based.
>  > >  > >>  >
>  > >  > >>  > On 06/03/2016 12:09 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>  > >  > >>  > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 11:37:28AM -0400, Murali
>  > > Karicheri
>  > >  wrote:
>  > >  > >>  > >> On 06/02/2016 09:55 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>  > >  > >>  > >>> On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 05:01:19AM +0000, Po Liu wrote:
>  > >  > >>  > >>>>>  -----Original Message-----  > >>>>>  From: Bjorn
>  > > Helgaas  > >> [mailto:helgaas@...nel.org]  > >>>>>  Sent: Thursday,
>  > > June 02, 2016  > >> 11:48 AM  > >>>>>  To: Po Liu  > >>>>>  Cc:
>  > >  > >> linux-pci@...r.kernel.org;  > >>>>>  > >>
>  > > linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org;
>  > >  > >>  > >>>>>  linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
>  > > devicetree@...r.kernel.org;  > >> Arnd  > >>>>> Bergmann;  Roy Zang;
>  > > Marc Zyngier; Stuart Yoder;  > >> Yang-Leo Li;  > >>>>> Minghuan
>  > > Lian; Bjorn  Helgaas; Shawn Guo;  > >> Mingkai Hu; Rob  > >>>>>
>  > > Herring  > >>>>>  Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2]  > >> aer: add support
>  > > aer interrupt with  > >>>>> none  MSI/MSI-X/INTx  > >> mode  > >>>>>
>  > > > >>>>>  [+cc Rob]  > >>>>>  > >>>>>  Hi Po,  >  > >> >>>>>  > >>>>>
>  > > On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 02:00:06PM +0800, Po Liu  > >> wrote:
>  > >  > >>  > >>>>>  > On some platforms, root port doesn't support  > >>
>  > > MSI/MSI-X/INTx  in RC mode.
>  > >  > >>  > >>>>>  > When chip support the aer interrupt with none  >
>  > > >> MSI/MSI-X/INTx  > >>>>> mode,  > maybe there is interrupt line
>  > > for  > >> aer pme etc. Search  > >>>>> the interrupt  > number in
>  > > the fdt  file.
>  > >  > >>  > >>>>>
>  > >  > >>  > >>>>>  My understanding is that AER interrupt signaling can
>  > > be  > >> done  > >>>>> via INTx,  MSI, or MSI-X (PCIe spec r3.0, sec
>  > > 6.2.4.1.2).
>  > >  > >>  > >>>>> Apparently your device  doesn't support MSI or MSI-X.
>  > > Are  > >> you  > >>>>> saying it doesn't support INTx  either?  How
>  > > is the  > >> interrupt  you're requesting here different from INTx?
>  > >  > >>  > >>>>
>  > >  > >>  > >>>> Layerscape use none of MSI or MSI-X or INTx to
>  > > indicate the  > >> > >>>> devices or root error in RC mode. But use
>  > > an independent SPI  > >> > >>>> interrupt(arm interrupt controller)
>  line.
>  > >  > >>  > >>>
>  > >  > >>  > >>> The Root Port is a PCI device and should follow the
>  > > normal  > >> PCI  > >>> rules for interrupts.  As far as I
>  > > understand, that  > >> means it  > >>> should use MSI, MSI-X, or
>  > > INTx.  If your Root Port  > >> doesn't use MSI  > >>> or MSI-X, it
>  > > should use INTx, the  > >> PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN register  > >>> should
>  > > tell us which (INTA/  > >> INTB/etc.), and  PCI_COMMAND_INTX_DISABLE
>  should work to disable it.
>  > >  > >>  > >>> That's all from the PCI point of view, of course.
>  > >  > >>  > >>
>  > >  > >>  > >> I am faced with the same issue on Keystone PCI hardware
>  > > and  > >> it has  > >> been on my TODO list  for quite some time.
>  > > Keystone  > >> PCI hardware  > >> also doesn't use MSI or MSI-X or
>  > > INTx for  > >> reporting errors received  > >> at the root port, but
>  > > use a  > >> platform interrupt instead (not  > >> complaint to PCI
>  > > standard as  > >> per PCI base spec). So I would need  > >> similar
>  > > change to have  > >> the error interrupt passed to the aer  > >>
>  > > driver. So there are  > >> hardware out there like Keystone which
>  > > requires to support this  through platform IRQ.
>  > >  > >>  > >
>  > >  > >>  > > This is not a new area of the spec, and it's hard for me
>  > > to  > >> believe  > > that these two new PCIe controllers are both
>  > > broken  > >> the same way  > > (although I guess both are
>  > > DesignWare-based, so  > >> maybe this is the  > > same underlying
>  > > problem in both cases?).  I  > >> think it's more likely  > > that
>  > > we just haven't figured out the  > >> right way to describe this in
>  the DT.
>  > >  > >>  >
>  > >  > >>  > Keystone is using an older version of the designware IP and
>  > > it  > >> > implements all of the interrupts in the application
>  > > register  > >> space  > unlike other newer version of the hardware.
>  > > So I assume,  > >> the version  > used on Layerscape is also an
>  > > older version and the  > >> both have same  > issue in terms of non
>  > > standard platform interrupt  > >> used for error  reporting.
>  > >  > >>  >
>  > >  > >>  > > I assume you have a Root Port with an AER capability, no
>  > > MSI  > >> > > capability, and no MSI-X capability, right?
>  > >  > >>  >
>  > >  > >>  > Has AER capability and both MSI and INTx (legacy)
>  > > capability  >  > >> > > What does its Interrupt  > > Pin register
>  > > contain?  If it's  > >> zero, it doesn't use INTx either, so  > >
>  > > according to the spec it  > >> should generate no interrupts.
>  > >  > >>  > >
>  > >  > >>  > At address offset 0x3C by default has a value of 1, but it
>  > > is  > >> writable  > by software. So default is INTx A.
>  > >  > >>
>  > >  > >>  0x3c is the Interrupt *Line*, which is read/write.  The
>  > > Interrupt  > >>  *Pin* is at 0x3d and should be read-only.
>  > >  > >>
>  > >  >
>  > >  > You are right. But default is 1 at this address.
>  > >  >
>  > >  > >>  Does your Keystone driver support MSI?  If so, since your
>  > > Root  > >> Port  supports MSI, I would think we would use that by
>  > > default, and  > >> the INTx  stuff wouldn't even matter.
>  > >  > >
>  > >  > > Layerscape is also shows "Both message signaled interrupts
>  > > (MSI) and  legacy INTx are supported."
>  > >  > > But both of them not work for AER interrupt when devices or
>  > > root  port report aer error.
>  > >  > > But another GIC interrupt line do.
>  > >  >
>  > >  > Same with Keystone. Even though both MSI and INTx are supported
>  > > error  > interrupt at root port is reported on a different interrupt
>  > > line than  > MSI/INTx. So for Power Management event interrupt is
>  > > also different  > line.
>  > >
>  > >  I'm looking at the "Error Message Controls" diagram in the PCIe
>  > > spec  r3.0, sec 6.2.6.  Does this hardware fit into the
>  > > platform-specific  "System Error" case there?  Do the Root Control
>  > > enable bits (in the PCIe
>  > >  Capability) control this interrupt?  If so, maybe this makes more
>  > > sense  than I thought.
>  >
>  > It supposedly not the "System Error" case. But "the Error Interrupt"
>  case.
>  > Which means " Root Error Command register " could control the
>  > interrupt  line we have now. (refer PCIe spec r3.0, sec 6.2.6)
>  
>  Did you actually try this out and verify that the PCIe Root Control
>  enable bits have no effect and the AER Root Error Command bits do
>  control it?  The names are very similar, so there's lots of room for
>  misunderstanding here :)

Yes, all these result were tested before reply.

>  
>  If the AER Root Error Command does control this interrupt, I think the
>  PCI_COMMAND_INTX_DISABLE bit in the PCI Command register should also
>  control it (per sec 6.2.4.1.2).

Yes, I am sure the PCI_COMMAND_INTX_DISABLE bit can also control this interrupt.

>  
>  > May this kind of hardware design route broken the spec?
>  
>  If the Reporting Enable bits in the Root Port's AER Root Error Command
>  register control the interrupt, but the interrupt is not delivered via
>  the Root Port's INTx or MSI/MSI-X, I think the design is not following
>  the spec.
>  
>  All the information needed by the AER driver should be communicated via
>  the config space mechanisms described in the spec (AER capability,
>  MSI/MSI-X capabilities, Interrupt Pin, etc.)  That way the driver works
>  without change on future spec-compliant hardware.
>  
>  > PME also like the AER. Hotplug is not supported. Others not known.
>  > Po Liu
>  
>  Per sec 6.1.6, I think PME *should* be signaled by the Root Port's INTx
>  or MSI/MSI-X.
>  
>  In particular, it says "Note that all other interrupt sources within the
>  same Function will assert the same virtual INTx wire when requesting
>  service."  To me, that means that if we're using INTx, it will be the
>  same INTx for AER, PME, hotplug, etc., and it should be the one
>  indicated by the Interrupt Pin register.
>  
>  But I think on your Root Port:
>  
>    - There is an MSI capability, but MSI doesn't actually work at all
>    - Interrupt Pin contains 1, indicating INTA, which is routed to IRQ X
>    - AER interrupts are routed to some different IRQ Y
>    - PME interrupts are routed to a third IRQ Z
>  

The descriptions are all right.

>  So how should we work around this?  I think you should be able to get
>  partway there with a quirk that sets:
>  
>    dev->no_msi = 1;
>    dev->irq = Y;
>  
>  for this device.  That should make AER work, but of course PME would not
>  work.
>  
>  Is there a way to set up your interrupt controller so these three
>  interrupts (X, Y, Z above) all map to the same Linux IRQ?  If you can do
>  that, you could set up INTA, the AER interrupt, and the PME interrupt to
>  all be on the same IRQ and everything should work.
>  
>  Bjorn

We'll think about all the ways. It is really helpful, thanks!  

Powered by blists - more mailing lists