[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1465375331.3944.8.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 10:42:11 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] futex: Calculate the futex key based on a tail page for
file-based futexes
On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 09:04 +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 07:52:59PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-06-07 at 19:50 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 01:30:17PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> >
> > Wants a stable tag so it gets auto-snarfed by Greg?
>
> Can I assume it passed tests for you?
While I didn't test this specific patch, modulo 'tail' vs 'pinned',
it's identical to the three liner I tested to confirm that the
get/put_page() bits I added were in indeed superfluous.. so yeah, it
definitely squashes buglet.
-Mike
Powered by blists - more mailing lists