[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5757EB51.5040902@mev.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 10:54:25 +0100
From: Ian Abbott <abbotti@....co.uk>
To: Ravishankar Karkala Mallikarjunayya <ravishankarkm32@...il.com>,
hsweeten@...ionengravers.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] Staging: comedi: dmm32at: Prefer using the BIT macro
On 08/06/16 06:30, Ravishankar Karkala Mallikarjunayya wrote:
> This fixes all occurences of (1<<x) by BIT(x) to get rid of checkpatch.pl
> "CHECK" output "Prefer using the BIT macro"
>
> Signed-off-by: Ravishankar Karkala Mallikarjunayya <ravishankarkm32@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/dmm32at.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/dmm32at.c b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/dmm32at.c
> index 958c0d4..4ca6104 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/dmm32at.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/dmm32at.c
Most of these are fine, but...
[snip]
> #define DMM32AT_CTRL_PAGE_8254 (0 << 0)
> -#define DMM32AT_CTRL_PAGE_8255 (1 << 0)
> +#define DMM32AT_CTRL_PAGE_8255 BIT(0)
> #define DMM32AT_CTRL_PAGE_CALIB (3 << 0)
That one makes the code less readable as the above three macros are for
the same bitfield, and should have similar-looking macro expansions.
[snip]
> #define DMM32AT_AI_CFG_SCINT_20US (0 << 4)
> -#define DMM32AT_AI_CFG_SCINT_15US (1 << 4)
> +#define DMM32AT_AI_CFG_SCINT_15US BIT(4)
> #define DMM32AT_AI_CFG_SCINT_10US (2 << 4)
> #define DMM32AT_AI_CFG_SCINT_5US (3 << 4)
The same thing here.
[snip]
--
-=( Ian Abbott @ MEV Ltd. E-mail: <abbotti@....co.uk> )=-
-=( Web: http://www.mev.co.uk/ )=-
Powered by blists - more mailing lists