[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160608133350.GA18357@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 15:33:50 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux@...ck-us.net, tony@...mide.com,
linux@....linux.org.uk, rostedt@...dmis.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
pavel@....cz, mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL arm] Use _rcuidle tracepoints to allow tracing from
idle
* Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 09:26:06AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Hello, Ingo,
> >
> > This series changes a number of event tracepoints to their _rcuidle() form
> > to allow use from idle without lockdep-RCU complaints, a straightforward
> > modification that has been successfully applied many times. These splats
> > were found in testing by Guenter Roeck and Tony Lindgren, who have
> > both successfully tested the full series. Tony asked that I carry these
> > in -rcu:
> >
> > http://lkml.kernel.org/g/20160426213630.GV5995@atomide.com
> >
> > These have been posted to LKML, CCing relevant maintainers, who have
> > not objected to the proposed changes:
> >
> > http://lkml.kernel.org/g/20160516184844.GA20144@linux.vnet.ibm.com
> >
> > These maintainers are also CCed on this pull request.
> >
> > They have also been subjected to 0day Test Robot and -next testing.
>
> And this time actually including the pull request... :-/
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
> These changes are available in the git repository at:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git for-mingo
>
> for you to fetch changes up to e7c38dda94b23965a3eb46ef4656bb8cb921933d:
>
> arm: Use _rcuidle suffix to allow clk_core_enable() to used from idle (2016-05-18 11:55:29 -0700)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Paul E. McKenney (6):
> arm: Use _rcuidle tracepoint to allow use from idle
> arm: Use _rcuidle for suspend/resume tracepoints
> arm: Add _rcuidle tracepoints to allow clk_core_disable() use from idle
> arm: Add _rcuidle suffix to allow rpm_idle() use from idle
> arm: Add _rcuidle suffix to allow rpm_resume() to be called from idle
> arm: Use _rcuidle suffix to allow clk_core_enable() to used from idle
>
> arch/arm/kernel/smp.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.c | 9 +++++----
> drivers/base/power/runtime.c | 14 +++++++-------
> drivers/clk/clk.c | 8 ++++----
> 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
Just wondering, wouldn't it be better for Russell to pull/apply, as it appears to
be a mostly ARM patch-set?
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists