[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160608160255.GD6727@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 12:02:55 -0400
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] mm: remove LRU balancing effect of temporary page
isolation
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 04:39:44PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 03:48:31PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > @@ -832,9 +854,9 @@ static void __pagevec_lru_add_fn(struct page *page, struct lruvec *lruvec,
> > * Add the passed pages to the LRU, then drop the caller's refcount
> > * on them. Reinitialises the caller's pagevec.
> > */
> > -void __pagevec_lru_add(struct pagevec *pvec)
> > +void __pagevec_lru_add(struct pagevec *pvec, bool new)
> > {
> > - pagevec_lru_move_fn(pvec, __pagevec_lru_add_fn, NULL);
> > + pagevec_lru_move_fn(pvec, __pagevec_lru_add_fn, (void *)new);
> > }
>
> Just trivial:
>
> 'new' argument would be not clear in this context what does it mean
> so worth to comment it, IMO but no strong opinion.
True, it's a little mysterious. I'll document it.
> Other than that,
>
> Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists