linux-kernel - Re: Re: [PATCH] staging: slicoss: replacement of goto statements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160608171356.GA30351@kroah.com>
Date:	Wed, 8 Jun 2016 10:13:56 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Jaime Arrocha <jarr@...ercoder.com>
Cc:	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, liodot@...il.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, charrer@...critech.com
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] staging: slicoss: replacement of goto statements

On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 11:28:11AM -0500, Jaime Arrocha wrote:
> 
> ---- On Wed, 08 Jun 2016 10:49:47 -0500 Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote ---- 
> 
>  > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 08:46:06AM -0500, Jaime Arrocha wrote: 
>  > > From: Jaime Arrocha <jarr@...ercoder.com> 
>  > >  
>  > > Replaced deprecated goto statements. 
>  >  
>  > Since when is 'goto' deprecated? 
>  >  
>  > Were you able to test these changes? 
>  >  
>  > thanks, 
>  >  
>  > greg k-h 
>  > 
>  > 
> 
> Just wanted to see your stance on this type of changes. The
> documentation says "deprecated by some people".

What documentation?  And what people?

> I didn't test the changes. But it compiled and logically tested
> possible outcomes.
> 
> Not good enough? :)

Nope, sorry, churn for churn's sake isn't acceptable.

greg k-h